A new report from the Crime Prevention Research Center (CPRC) claims that FBI data contains ‘massive errors’ when tracking active shooting incidents, underestimating how often armed citizens thwarted situations of active firing over the past eight years.

“While collecting such data is fraught with pitfalls, some see a pattern of distortion in the FBI’s numbers because the errors go almost exclusively in one direction, downplaying the vital actions of armed citizens,” the report said, which was provided to Fox News Digital. this week by the founder and president of the Center for Crime Prevention Research, John Lott, says.

Data released by the nonprofit organization shows that 34.4% of active shootings were thwarted by armed citizens between 2014 and 2021. However, FBI data shows that only 4.4% of active shootings were thwarted by armed citizens during this period.

A total of 360 active shooter incidents were identified by the CPRC between 2014 and 2021, including 124 arrested by armed citizens. The FBI identified 252 active shooter incidents during the same period, only 11 of which were thwarted by armed citizens.

RICHMOND POLICE SAYS SHE FAKED POTENTIAL MASS SHOOTING ON JULY 4

The graph compares FBI data on active shootings and data from the Crime Prevention Research Center.

The graph compares FBI data on active shootings and data from the Crime Prevention Research Center.
(Crime Prevention Research Center)

“Whether deliberately out of bias or simply out of incompetence, the FBI’s active shooter database is untrustworthy,” Gary Mauser, professor emeritus at Simon Fraser University in Canada, claims in the report. .

The FBI defines an active shooter as “one or more individuals actively engaged in the murder or attempted murder of persons in a populated area.” The definition does not include crimes related to criminal activities such as thefts or gang wars.

The report highlights two variables that caused the discrepancies between the FBI’s data and the group’s research: misclassified shootings and overlooked incidents.

The research argues that the FBI misclassified at least five cases, including two cases where citizens with valid firearms licenses foiled a shooting, but the citizens were not listed in the report because that the police eventually apprehended the suspects. The other three misidentified cases include one where “the FBI just didn’t mention citizen engagement,” and two others that classified armed civilians as armed security personnel.

The discrepancies are also reflected in the FBI’s apparent oversight by not including 25 cases that were likely to have been mass shootings and thwarted by armed citizens, according to the report. This is in addition to 83 other active shooting incidents that were not detailed in FBI data.

ARIZONA MAN HAS KILLED IN THE HEAD AT FAMILY PARTY CREDIT HIS HIDDEN CARRY TO SAVE LIVES: ‘WOULD BE DEAD’

Left: Elisjsha Dicken, 22, of Seymour, was identified as the bystander who shot and killed a gunman who opened fire at Greenwood Park Mall.  Right: Greenwood Police Chief James Ison speaks during a press conference at Downtown Greenwood in Greenwood, Indiana.

Left: Elisjsha Dicken, 22, of Seymour, was identified as the bystander who shot and killed a gunman who opened fire at Greenwood Park Mall. Right: Greenwood Police Chief James Ison speaks during a press conference at Downtown Greenwood in Greenwood, Indiana.
(Dicken family/AP)

Several instances of armed individuals thwarting potential mass shootings have occurred this year, including in Indiana when legally armed 22-year-old Elisjsha Dicken engaged an active shooter in a mall and was praised for avoiding further of deceased.

“His actions were nothing short of heroic,” Greenwood Police Chief James Ison said of Dicken in July. “He engaged the shooter from quite a distance with a handgun. He was very skilled at it, very tactically sound. And as he got closer to the suspect, he was also waving people out. behind him.”

Liberal-leaning media jumped on the story and downplayed it, arguing that it’s rare for a legal gun owner to stop a mass shooting. Some news reports have pointed to FBI data as evidence that such cases are rare.

The report notes that the CPRC approached the FBI with discrepancies in their reports in August, but “the FBI refused to address them.”

The FBI directed Fox News Digital to page 2 of the agency’s 2021 active shooter report when approached to comment on the CPRC report and the discrepancies it found.

“The FBI works proactively to identify incidents that fall within the scope of our investigation, using internal FBI holdings and repositories, official law enforcement reports (when available), as well as open source data. There is no mandatory database collection or central intake point for reporting active shooter incidents, which exist for other crimes. If other incidents that meet the criteria of the FBI are identified after the release of the document, every effort is being made to consider these incidents in future reports,” the FBI report states.

HERE ARE 10 TIMES LEGAL GUN OWNERS HAVE RECENTLY COUNCED CRIMES IN DEADLY SITUATIONS

The CPRC’s October report also detailed how often armed citizens thwarted potential mass shootings or mass shootings in areas where guns are allowed, as opposed to increasingly gun-free areas. common found in some states and cities.

Data showing when an armed citizen foiled an active shooting in an area that allows the legal carrying of firearms versus the number of shooting incidents that occurred in a location that allows firearms.

Data showing when an armed citizen foiled an active shooting in an area that allows the legal carrying of firearms versus the number of shooting incidents that occurred in a location that allows firearms.
(Crime Prevention Research Center)

Between 2014 and 2021, there were 204 active shootings in areas that allowed people to carry guns, the data shows. Of the 204 cases, 104 of them were thwarted by an armed citizen, meaning that 51% of the attacks were thwarted by people legally carrying concealed handguns, according to the report.

“When I was at the Department of Justice, they just refused to go and see that. And that’s whether the active shooting event happened in a place where firearms are prohibited. And the reason this is important is that if you have a place where firearms are prohibited, it is very likely that the law-abiding civilian will obey the rules, and you cannot expect him to stop these types of attacks,” Lott told Fox News Digital.

A man draws his modern polymer Glock .45 caliber pistol from a holster inside the belt under his jacket.

A man draws his modern polymer Glock .45 caliber pistol from a holster inside the belt under his jacket.
(Stock)

Lott noted in a Real Clear Investigations article in August that law enforcement agencies do not compile active shooter reports to the FBI and that the FBI relies heavily on news reports. The FBI contracts active shooter studies to Texas State University’s Advanced Law Enforcement Rapid Response Training Center.

POLICE SAID ‘GOOD SAMARITAN’ PREVENTED FURTHER LOSS OF LIFE IN INDIANA MALL: ‘TACTICALLY SOUND’

“There is no reason to think that the media covers all cases where civilians have stopped attacks. And the further back in time we go, the more likely we are to miss cases,” the October report noted.

The report found that the further back in history researchers go to examine armed citizens thwarting attacks, the more cases will be missed. Data from the nonprofit in 2021, for example, shows that 49.1% of active shootings were thwarted, with that percentage decreasing every year since 2014; In 2020, 45.1% of active shootings were stopped, while in 2019, 42.1% of such crimes were foiled and in 2018, 39.4%, according to the CPRC.

The Crime Prevention Research Center chart shows how much harder it is to find cases further back in history.

The Crime Prevention Research Center chart shows how much harder it is to find cases further back in history.
(Crime Prevention Research Center)

Other crime experts have also pointed out that media reports detailing armed citizens thwarting crimes cannot accurately capture the full picture. An armed citizen, for example, may simply show his firearm to thwart a crime or attack, which may often go unreported by the police.

GUN CRIMES GET THE MOST MEDIA ATTENTION, WHILE USE OF GUN IN SELF-DEFENSE GETS ONLY A FRACTION: EXPERTS

“National surveys reveal that guns are rarely fired when used to stop a violent attack,” Professor Mauser told Real Clear Investigations last year. “Such cases are unlikely to be reported to the police, and even less likely to be found in media reports. Relying on media reports would significantly understate the true number of defensive firearm uses. fire.”

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

The October report notes that even the CPRC likely missed some incidents because they likely weren’t covered by the media in a way that would hit the center’s radar.



Source link